• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu

The Urbanic Law Firm

Oklahoma city criminal defense attorney Frank Urbanic provides efficient, effective, and relentless representation.

625 NW 13th St

Oklahoma City, Ok 73103

405-633-3420

  • Home
  • About
    • In the News
    • Frank Urbanic
    • Corey Brennan
    • Ky Corley
  • Answers
    • Crimes
    • Procedure
    • DUI / DWI / APC
    • Assault / Battery / Domestic Violence
    • Firearms
  • Blog
  • Wins
  • Contact
  • Areas Served
    • State Courts
    • Municipalities
      • OKC Metro

Procuring a Minor for Child Sexual Abuse Material or Obscene Material in Oklahoma: Law, Penalties, & Defenses

1. Attorney making a closing argument to a jury for Oklahoma procuring minor obscene material criminal defense by The Urbanic Law Firm.Procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material is a serious Oklahoma felony. The charge focuses on knowingly procuring a minor under 18 or causing that minor to participate in prohibited material. A conviction can bring a prison term, a substantial fine, and long-term registration consequences.

This guide is for people accused of procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material in Oklahoma who want to understand the charge, possible punishment, defense options, and sex offender registration risk before going to court.

Can a minor’s consent be a defense to procuring or causing the minor to participate in child sexual abuse material in Oklahoma?

No. A minor’s consent, or a parent, guardian, or custodian’s consent, doesn’t create a defense to this offense. However, the State still has to prove knowing procurement or causation, a minor under 18, and qualifying material.

The Urbanic Law Firm can review the charging language, messages, device evidence, search warrant, witness accounts, and whether the material meets Oklahoma’s legal definitions.

Fill out our secure online form so our attorneys can better understand your situation before we speak. You may also call us at 405-633-3420.

Why clients trust The Urbanic Law Firm with procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material charges

Criminal defense focus: Corey Brennan handles felony cases throughout Oklahoma

Trial credentials: CALI Trial Practice award and major felony jury-trial experience

Published sex-crime analysis: Corey authored Oklahoma Level 3 Sex Crimes

Quick links

  • What is procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material?
  • Key elements the State must prove
  • Penalties
  • Sex offender registration risk
  • Collateral consequences
  • How prosecutors prove procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material
  • Practical guide if you’re charged with this crime
  • What happens next
  • Comparison to related offenses
  • Key terms
  • FAQs
  • This crime in the news

What is procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material?

Under 21 O.S. § 1021.2, this charge covers knowingly procuring a minor under 18, or causing that minor’s participation, in child sexual abuse material or obscene material. The State must prove the accused knowingly procured the minor or caused the minor’s participation in qualifying material.

21 O.S. § 1024.1 supplies important definitions for child sexual abuse material, obscene material, sexually explicit conduct, performances, and visual depictions. Those definitions can make the content itself a major disputed issue.

This page reflects Oklahoma law effective April 13, 2026 and applies to crimes alleged to have been committed on or after that date. Law may be different for crimes alleged to have been committed before April 13, 2026.

An Oklahoma procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material defense attorney must separate proof that material exists from proof that the accused caused or procured the minor’s participation.

Depending on the allegations, prosecutors may also file a permitting a minor to participate in child sexual abuse material count under 21 O.S. § 1021.3. They may instead add a procuring, producing, or publishing child sexual abuse material count under 21 O.S. § 1040.8 when the facts support that separate offense.

For broader context about nearby Level 2 charges involving minors and obscene material, see the firm’s obscene-material offenses involving minors guide.

Key elements the State must prove

Jury instruction 4-135B breaks this theory into four core elements. The evidence has to connect the accused to the minor’s participation, not merely to the existence of prohibited material.

  • Knowing conduct: The accused acted knowingly.
  • Procurement or causation: The accused procured the minor or caused the minor’s participation.
  • Minor: The participant was under 18.
  • Qualifying material: The minor participated in child sexual abuse material or obscene material.

The charge focuses on causing or procuring a minor’s participation, not merely possessing a file after someone else created it.

Penalties

This offense is a Class B1 felony listed in 21 O.S. § 20F. The statutory penalty can reach decades of incarceration and significant financial consequences.

  • Prison: Up to 20 years.
  • Fine: Up to $25,000.
  • Deferred sentence: A conviction isn’t eligible for a deferred sentence.
  • 85% rule: The offense is covered by 21 O.S. § 13.1, so a prison sentence requires service of at least 85% before parole consideration. Earned credits can’t reduce the sentence below that threshold. The firm’s Oklahoma 85% crime guide explains that rule in more detail.
  • Violent-crime classification: The offense is treated as a violent crime under 57 O.S. § 571.
  • Post-imprisonment supervision: Except for a life or life-without-parole sentence, imprisonment for two years or more requires post-imprisonment supervision under 22 O.S. § 991a. That supervision is in addition to the prison term.
  • Prior felony convictions: Prior convictions can increase sentencing consequences under 21 O.S. § 51.1. The firm’s Oklahoma sentence enhancement guide explains how prior convictions can affect a felony case.

Sex offender registration risk

This page covers the Level 2 sex-crime version of this offense. The Oklahoma Department of Corrections level-assignment form places this offense at Level 2. For an Oklahoma sentence, Level 2 registration lasts 25 years from completion of the sentence, with address verification every six months.

The Department of Corrections registration policy explains the duration and administration of registration. The Oklahoma Attorney General also maintains an official sex offender registry resource.

An Oklahoma sex crime defense attorney should account for registration consequences while evaluating the criminal case itself.

The firm’s Level 2 sex-crime guide explains how this registration category fits into Oklahoma’s broader system.

Collateral consequences

A conviction can affect daily life long after the criminal sentence ends. Collateral penalties can reach housing, employment, family relationships, and other parts of your future. An Oklahoma sex crime defense lawyer should consider those effects alongside the courtroom issues.

  • Public registration: Registry information can remain publicly available throughout the registration period.
  • Housing restrictions: Registration can sharply restrict where you may live.
  • Employment and licensing: Background and registry checks can affect jobs, professional licenses, education, and volunteer work.
  • Family consequences: A conviction can affect custody, visitation, and household arrangements involving minors.
  • Reporting obligations: Registration can require continuing address verification and updates when covered information changes.

How prosecutors prove procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material

Prosecutors need evidence tying the accused to the minor’s participation and to material that legally qualifies. Because these cases can involve phones, recordings, messages, and cloud data, attribution and context can become central.

  • Messages and instructions: Prosecutors may rely on texts, chats, emails, or other communications that they say directed or arranged the minor’s participation.
  • Age evidence: Records and witnesses may be used to establish that the participant was under 18.
  • Digital records: Metadata, account records, device extractions, and cloud information may be used to connect a person to a recording or file.
  • Identity evidence: Investigators may rely on account ownership, device possession, login activity, witnesses, or statements to identify who acted.
  • Witness evidence: Statements from the minor or other witnesses may address how the material was created and who caused the participation.
  • Content evidence: The State must show that the material satisfies the applicable legal definition.

Practical guide if you’re charged with this crime

What we look for first in a procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material case

We first separate evidence of the material from evidence of who allegedly procured or caused the minor’s participation. An Oklahoma procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material defense lawyer also needs to examine age proof, digital attribution, the search, and the exact content involved.

Defenses

  • No procurement or causation: The evidence doesn’t establish that the accused procured the minor or caused the minor’s participation.
  • No knowing conduct: The evidence doesn’t establish that the accused knowingly directed, arranged, or caused the participation.
  • Age not proved: The State lacks proof that the participant was under 18 at the relevant time.
  • Material outside the definition: The image, video, or performance doesn’t meet the required legal definition.
  • Unlawful search or seizure: Evidence is subject to suppression when officers obtain it through an unconstitutional search or seizure.

How we fight these charges

  • Preserve original devices, cloud records, messages, and available metadata so later summaries don’t replace the underlying evidence.
  • Reconstruct the timeline to compare alleged communications, recordings, device access, and the minor’s claimed participation.
  • Test attribution by examining who controlled each device, account, login, network, and file location.
  • Litigate unlawful searches by examining probable cause, warrant scope, consent, seizures, and digital extraction methods.
  • Prepare cross-examination and expert review around disputed content, metadata, digital evidence, and witness accounts.

What The Urbanic Law Firm does to help clients charged with this crime

  • Organize reports, warrants, device records, court documents, and discovery into a usable case file.
  • Explain court settings, evidence issues, registration risk, and important decisions in direct terms.
  • Track discovery requests, forensic materials, deadlines, hearings, and unresolved evidence issues.
  • Coordinate appropriate expert review when digital attribution or technical evidence becomes important.
  • Communicate developments and next steps so you know what the case requires from you.

Questions to ask you attorney

  • What evidence does the State claim shows I procured the minor or caused the participation?
  • How does the State plan to prove the participant’s age?
  • What evidence connects me to the device, account, recording, or communication?
  • Did investigators stay within the warrant and other constitutional limits?
  • What registration and sentencing consequences follow the realistic outcomes in my case?

Things you can do if you’re arrested for this crime

  • Preserve devices, messages, files, and cloud data without deleting, resetting, editing, or wiping anything.
  • Avoid discussing the allegations on social media or in public messages.
  • Don’t contact the minor or another witness when a court order or release condition limits contact.
  • Follow every bond condition while the case is pending.
  • Collect court papers, warrant paperwork, property receipts, and a timeline of important events.

What happens next

The next stages usually move from initial court settings into evidence review, contested hearings, motions, and trial preparation. A felony case can include an Oklahoma preliminary hearing, where the State presents evidence supporting the charge.

Digital cases can require extensive discovery because phones, computers, cloud accounts, and forensic reports may contain large amounts of data. If constitutional issues exist, motion practice can determine whether disputed evidence remains in the case.

For a more detailed overview of the criminal process in Oklahoma, you can learn more in the firm’s Oklahoma criminal process guide.

How this charge compares with related Oklahoma offenses

These offenses can look similar, but they focus on different conduct. The punishments and registration consequences can differ because each offense targets a different role.

Offense Core conduct Mental state / relationship Classification Common defense issue
Procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material or obscene material Procuring a minor under 18 or causing the minor to participate in qualifying material Knowingly; no special family relationship required Class B1 felony; up to 20 years; Level 2 registration Whether the accused caused participation and whether the material qualifies
Permitting a minor to participate in child sexual abuse material A covered parent, guardian, or custodian knowingly permits or consents to the minor’s participation Knowing conduct plus the required parent, guardian, or custody relationship Class B1 felony; up to 20 years; Level 2 registration Covered relationship, knowledge, permission, and participation
Procuring, producing, or publishing child sexual abuse material Creating, preparing, publishing, displaying, distributing, or participating in preparation of covered material Knowing conduct; no parent or custodian status required Class B2 felony; 3–20 years on a first conviction; Level 2 registration Specific act, attribution, knowledge, and whether the material qualifies

Key terms

Child sexual abuse material

Child sexual abuse material means a visual depiction of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct; a visual depiction altered so the child appears to engage in that conduct; or an obscene visual depiction that appears to be a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct, whether the apparent child is actual, computer-generated, or altered. (21 O.S. § 1024.1 & jury instruction 4-139)

For this charge, however, the State separately has to prove a minor under 18 was procured or caused to participate. So the broader material definition doesn’t erase the minor-participation element.

Obscene

Obscene means a performance or depiction that, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex under contemporary community standards, depicts sexually explicit conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific value to a reasonable person. (21 O.S. § 1024.1 & jury instruction 4-139)

Content isn’t legally obscene merely because someone considers it offensive. If the State relies on the obscene-material branch, each part of this definition can matter.

Performance

Performance means any display, live, recorded, or transmitted, in any form or medium. (21 O.S. § 1024.1 & jury instruction 4-139)

A live, recorded, or transmitted display can therefore matter even when the allegation isn’t limited to a conventional photograph. The evidence still must connect the minor’s participation to the accused’s conduct.

Sexually explicit conduct

Sexually explicit conduct includes specified actual or simulated sexual intercourse, oral or anal sodomy, masturbation, sexual activity with an animal, sadomasochism, excretion in a sexual context, and exhibition of genitalia, breast, or pubic area for the viewer’s sexual stimulation. (21 O.S. § 1024.1 & jury instruction 4-139)

The actual content matters because the State can’t substitute a general sexual characterization for the defined conduct. File context and what the depiction actually shows can therefore become disputed.

Visual depiction

Visual depiction means any depiction, picture, movie, performance, or image displayed, stored, shared, or transmitted in any format or medium, including data capable of conversion into a depiction, picture, movie, performance, or image. (21 O.S. § 1024.1 & jury instruction 4-139)

Digital storage doesn’t place material outside the definition. But attribution still matters because a file’s presence doesn’t by itself identify who caused a minor to participate.

FAQs

Can a conviction for procuring a minor for child sexual abuse material in Oklahoma be expunged?

A conviction for this offense doesn’t fit the ordinary felony-conviction expungement categories because it’s an 85% offense and requires sex offender registration. However, a dismissal, acquittal, or another non-conviction result can present different issues. The firm’s Oklahoma expungement guide explains the general eligibility rules.

Does Oklahoma require physical contact for causing a minor to participate in obscene material?

No. Physical contact isn’t one of the listed elements of this charge. The State instead has to prove knowing procurement or causation, a minor under 18, and participation in qualifying material.

Can Oklahoma charge procurement of a minor if the image isn’t child sexual abuse material?

Yes, because this offense also covers a minor’s participation in obscene material. However, the State still has to prove that the material satisfies the applicable legal definition and that the accused knowingly procured or caused the participation.

Can Oklahoma treat separate images as separate acts in a minor sexual-abuse-material case?

Oklahoma law provides that each visual depiction or individual image of child sexual abuse material constitutes a separate item and act. However, the State still has to prove the facts needed for each charged act and connect them to the charged conduct.

Can a computer-generated image alone prove an Oklahoma charge for procuring a minor into sexual abuse material?

Not by itself for this participation charge. The State still has to prove that a minor under 18 was procured or caused to participate. A computer-generated or altered image can fit the broader material definition in some circumstances, but it doesn’t eliminate the separate minor-participation element.

This crime in the news

On April 25, 2024, KXII reported from Idabel that Robert Groven was charged in McCurtain County after court records alleged he recorded acts involving two children. KXII also reported a producing child pornography allegation. The reported use of recordings illustrates why creation evidence can matter when prosecutors claim an adult caused a minor to participate in prohibited material.

About the Author: Attorney Corey Brennan

Oklahoma criminal defense attorney Corey Brennan
  • Criminal defense practice: Focuses exclusively on criminal defense, representing clients in misdemeanor and felony cases throughout Oklahoma.
  • Trial advocacy honors: National member of the Order of Barristers and recipient of the CALI Award for top honors in Trial Practice.
  • Trial experience: Has successfully represented clients in major felony jury trials and a wide range of serious Oklahoma criminal cases.

Corey’s Recent Posts

This page is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Every case is unique; consult an attorney about your specific situation. Law last reviewed on September 27, 2026 by attorney Corey Brennan. Page last updated September 27, 2026. Review the statutes cited on this page for the most current version of the law.

Start Building Your Strategy

Complete the secure form so our attorneys can better understand your situation before we speak.

    Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

    CRIMES

    Alcohol
    Animals
    Arson
    Assault/Battery/Domestic Abuse
    Boating
    Burglary & Trespass
    Children
    Coercion & Intimidation
    Dangerous Driving
    Disorderly Conduct & Public Decency
    Drugs – Possession / Intent / Trafficking
    Drunk Driving – DUI / DWI / APC
    Elder & Caretaker Abuse
    Escape/Harboring/Bail
    Firearms
    Forgery
    Fraud & Deception
    Homicide
    Identity & Impersonation
    Jail/Prison Contraband/Unauthorized Entry
    Obstruction of Justice
    Payment & Cyber Crimes
    Public Order/Terrorism/Explosives
    Robbery
    Sex Crimes – Level 3 / 2 / 1 / Non-register
    VPO Violation
    Theft & Property Crimes
    Threatening/Harassing Communication
    Vandalism/Malicious Mischief
    White Collar

    PROCEDURE

    Expungements
    Youthful Offender
    Probation
    85% Crimes
    Violent Crimes
    Victim Protective Order – VPO
    Criminal Process in Oklahoma
    Diversion Programs
    Sentence Enhancement
    Bail
    Restitution

    RECENT BLOG POSTS
    Woman on Oklahoma SB 137 electronic monitoring playing with a golden retriever in a park, illustrating Oklahoma criminal defense issues analyzed by The Urbanic Law Firm.

    Legislative Payback or Public Safety? Sara Polston’s Shocking Constitutional Fight!

    August 30, 2026 By Frank Urbanic

    Oklahoma property damage scene showing a Tulsa storefront smeared with waste, illustrating criminal defense issues analyzed by The Urbanic Law Firm.

    Tulsa’s “Serial Defecator” Case: Legal Analysis of a Messy Situation

    August 22, 2026 By Frank Urbanic

    oklahoma-discovery-law-criminal-defense-urbanic-law-firm.png

    Oklahoma Discovery Law Changes: 2026–2027 Guide

    August 17, 2026 By Corey Brennan

    Police SUV outside an Oklahoma home representing Oklahoma domestic abuse changes and criminal defense by The Urbanic Law Firm.

    Oklahoma Domestic Abuse Law Updates Nov. 1: Five Big Changes

    August 17, 2026 By Corey Brennan

    WINS

    DUI – Deferred

    11/14/2019 ● Oklahoma County

    DUI – DEFERRED

    7/30/18 ● Cleveland County

    Actual Physical Control – REDUCED to Public Intoxication & Deferred

    1/21/2021 ● Oklahoma County

    DUI – Deferred

    Transporting an Open Container – Deferred

    Unsafe Lane Use – Deferred

    10/1/2020 ● Pottawatomie County

    Transporting a Loaded Firearm – DISMISSED

    Unlawful Carrying of an Offensive Weapon – DISMISSED

    12/7/18 ● Western District of Oklahoma

    THIS OFFENSE IN THE NEWS
    DISTURBING ALLEGATIONS: Owasso man accused of recording himself sexually abusing a childKJRH 2 News Oklahoma, July 9, 2026 OBN arrests woman for trafficking 16-year-old runaway, producing child sexual abuse materialKOCO 5, April 22, 2025 Idabel man charged with child sexual abuseKXII, April 25, 2024

    Copyright © 2026 The Urbanic Law Firm, PLLC
    Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Licensing