AI-Generated Evidence & False Crime Reports: What the Florida “ChatGPT Attacker” Case Means for Oklahoma Law

In a recent headline-making story from Florida, a woman reported to police that she had been attacked in her home by a stranger—even providing what she claimed was a photo of the suspect sitting on her couch.

Investigators later discovered that the image wasn’t a photo at all—it had been generated by artificial intelligence. The file had even been saved in a deleted folder on her device days before the alleged incident.

The woman was arrested for falsely reporting a crime, highlighting how quickly AI technology is reshaping issues of truth, evidence, and criminal liability.

False Crime Reporting Under Oklahoma Law

Under 21 O.S. § 589, it is a crime in Oklahoma to willfully make a false report to law enforcement regarding a crime that didn’t occur.

• A false report can be a misdemeanor and is punishable by up to 90 days in the county jail and/or a fine up to $500.
• A false report of a missing child to a law enforcement agency that causes or encourages the activation of an AMBER alert warning system is a felony and can result in up to 2 years in prison and/or a fine up to $1,000.

Even if someone believes they’re helping police, knowingly making a false statement or fabricating evidence—such as AI-generated images or videos—can lead to arrest and prosecution.

Lessons for Criminal Defense in the Digital Age

1. Authenticity of Evidence Matters – AI tools like ChatGPT, DALL-E, and Midjourney can create images or messages that appear completely real. For defense attorneys, this means challenging digital evidence is more important than ever. Metadata, timestamps, and file histories can reveal whether “evidence” was fabricated or altered.
2. Mistaken or False Reports Can Happen – People sometimes misremember events, misidentify suspects, or rely on altered information. Oklahoma law distinguishes between intentional deceit and good-faith mistakes—a vital issue for any defense. An experienced criminal defense lawyer can show that a defendant did not willfully or knowingly make a false report, potentially avoiding conviction.
3. AI “Evidence” Can Be Used Against Defendants Too – Prosecutors increasingly rely on digital content—screenshots, texts, or videos—to prove crimes. But not all digital content is reliable. If a photo, message, or video could have been generated or altered by AI, your defense attorney can challenge its authenticity through digital forensics and expert testimony.

How The Urbanic Law Firm Defends Clients in Technology-Driven Cases

At The Urbanic Law Firm, we combine legal strategy with technical insight to defend clients accused of crimes involving false reports, assault, or digital evidence.

We:

• Conduct forensic analysis of phones, computers, and cloud accounts to detect fabricated files or manipulated evidence.
• Examine metadata and timestamps to show whether an image or document was created after the alleged event.
• Challenge the chain of custody for any digital evidence introduced by the prosecution.
• Advocate for our clients’ rights under Oklahoma and federal constitutional protections.

Why This Matters for Oklahomans

As AI technology becomes more accessible, law enforcement, prosecutors, and defense attorneys all face a new challenge: separating fact from fiction.

If you’ve been accused of:

• Making a false police report
• Fabricating evidence
• Harassment, stalking, or assault where digital content plays a role

You need a defense team that understands both Oklahoma law and modern digital forensics.

Frequently Asked Questions About False Reporting and AI Evidence in Oklahoma

1. What is the crime of making a false police report in Oklahoma?

Under 21 O.S. § 589, it’s a crime to intentionally give false information to law enforcement about a crime that didn’t happen.

2. Can someone be charged for using AI-generated images or videos as false evidence?

Yes. Submitting or showing AI-generated “deepfake” content as real evidence in a police report or investigation can be treated as fabricating or falsifying evidence, which is a serious offense under Oklahoma law.

3. What if the person didn’t know the information was false?

Intent matters. To be convicted, prosecutors must prove the person willfully and knowingly made a false report. If someone made a mistake or misunderstood the facts, an experienced criminal defense attorney can argue that there was no criminal intent.

4. How can a defense attorney challenge digital or AI-based evidence?

A skilled defense lawyer can bring in digital forensic experts to:

• Examine metadata, timestamps, and deleted files
• Determine whether an image or video was AI-generated or altered
• Expose breaks in the chain of custody or mishandling of digital evidence

5. What should I do if I’m accused of filing a false report in Oklahoma?

Do not make additional statements to police without counsel. Preserve your communications and files and contact an experienced Oklahoma criminal defense attorney immediately.

6. Why is The Urbanic Law Firm uniquely qualified to handle AI-related criminal cases?

Our attorneys stay ahead of emerging technology issues that affect criminal law. We understand how to cross-examine digital evidence, work with forensic experts, and expose unreliable or manipulated AI-generated content in Oklahoma courts.

Contact The Urbanic Law Firm

If you’ve been charged with a false report or any other criminal offense in Oklahoma, contact The Urbanic Law Firm today. Call 405-633-3420 or fill out our form.
Based in Oklahoma City and serving clients statewide.